On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> While the I-D will likely expires they will not be removed from the >> website, so references will still work, so I don't see as that bad that >> they are properly referenced in this document. I however agree we should >> provide a quick summary for people that do not need the details. >> > > On the flipside, I don't see what value they add; the ones that gain > consensus will be published in their own right, and the details of the ones > that don't probably aren't interesting to later readers anyway. > > -MSK > I'm OK either way. Tim, would you care to weigh in as the WG chair? It's an easy change to make and it would be nice to close out this milestone. What about demoting the I-D citations to an Appendix? --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
