On Mon 09/Nov/2015 15:44:05 +0100 internet-drafts wrote:
>
> [...] This document describes interoperability
> issues between DMARC and indirect email flows. Possible methods for
> addressing interoperability issues are presented.
I'm sorry I'm not sure whether this issue on the following text was discussed
already:
The later modification may create issues because it is an invalid
domain name, and some MTAs may pay particular attention to the
validity of email addresses in RFC5322.From and the reputation of
the domains present there.
Lots of mail have ``From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>''. In this
case, changing that to ``From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>''
seems to be even worse than having an invalid domain. A display phrase that
resembles an address which differs from the effective one is a clear sign of
phishing, isn't it? Is it worth to add a warning?
For a nit, shouldn't s/The later modification/The latter modification/?
(I'm no native English speaker)
Ale
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
