On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Tim Draegen <[email protected]> wrote:
> The WG will now move ahead to phase 2: > > https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/trac/wiki/MilestoneTwoWiki > > When discussing methods and techniques that address an interoperability > issue, please explicitly reference the issue from the > draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability draft. This will allow for easier > tracking of issues & proposed fixes by volunteers a lot easier. > I would like to officially propose, and ask for the WG's support of adopting https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andersen-arc/ and the corresponding, but separate usage recommendations https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-arc-usage/ as standards-track documents within the WG to help mitigate the interoperability problems that were cataloged. Specifically, in draft -09 of the interop document, I had cited ARC in section 4.2 as an instance of a "[m]echanism[s] to extend Authentication-Results [RFC7601] to multiple hops. . ." ( https://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-09#section-4.2) but subsequently abstracted that "work in progress" out of the document to honor our milestone framework. --Kurt Andersen
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
