>> Murray, I've seen no response to Ned's note (which I agree with) that >> explains why we think the charter, as written, covers the ARC work. >> Do you have any follow-up, or did Ned's message address your concern? > > I think we can call it "addressed" by me accepting that I'm in the rough in > terms of consensus. If my interpretation is singular, there's no need to > dwell on it.
Great; then the work is accepted, and the starting-point documents will become working group documents. Please submit new versions of those documents with working group file names, as follows: draft-andersen-arc -> draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-00 draft-jones-arc-usage -> draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage-00 When you submit them, please be sure to fill in the "replaces" field on the second page of the submission form with the old file name. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
