On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > While mailing lists can be adversely impacted, I don't think > > s/can/are/ above, as previously agreed. > > > that they are necessarily more impacted than the other items > > which are called out in the body of the document. > > It is IMO entirely noteworthy that the primary mechanism used > to discuss the definition of mail protocols, including this one, > has been adversely affected by this mail protocol. > > One can quite rightly and fairly claim that that trade-off is > overall a win for the mail ecosystem, but not being explicit > about what has been the biggest downside of dmarc, from the > IETF participant perspective, seems plain wrong. +1. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
