I'm quoting the following response in a thread from the dmarc-disc...@dmarc.org mailing list, because I think it identifies work items or at least questions this WG may want to address. If this is already captured somewhere, my apologies.
Here's the original thread: http://lists.dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/2016-July/003546.html Summary: How should DMARC aggregate reports reflect messages with multiple DKIM results? And should DKIM selectors be included in DMARC aggregate reports? On 07/07/2016 09:16, Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss wrote: > > And yes, it's entirely possible for a message to have 2 or more DKIM > signatures, including signatures for the same domain with different > results. As long as there exists a DKIM signature that is aligned and > passes, the DMARC DKIM result is pass. (As I recall, the spec is unclear > about what you do if there are multiple DKIM results. That should > probably be fixed and it would be nice if we allowed the selector to be > reported as well.) AND: On 07/07/2016 09:53, Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss wrote: > > I meant to say that the spec is unclear about what you do about > **reporting** multiple DKIM results. It's perfectly clear on how to > evaluate them. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
