Is it worth having a Hackaton ARC interop testing in Chicago?
> On 2 Jan 2017, at 20:04, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Kurt Andersen <[email protected]> wrote: >> 1) Murray had promised some ideas for restructuring the draft to make it >> more understandable, but I haven't received them yet. > > I've been making notes about this as I complete the first releasable version > of OpenARC. I think it's there now, but really needs some time spent on > documentation and then proper testing against a common accepted corpus (see > Steve's message) which I can help to construct. The availability of such a > thing obviates the need for coordinated testing, which seems to have been > hard to arrange lately, although I'd like it if we could get one together > perhaps before/during/after the next M3AWG meeting in SF because the DKIM one > was so useful. > > I concur, though, no need to meet in Chicago, at least formally. I'll be > there though if anyone wants to work on something. > > -MSK > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
