>>> Most of the effort has been focused on getting ARC deployed in to >>> production so there has been relatively little attention to the "what's >>> next" question. Peter had started a thread a few months ago but it did not >>> get much (or any) traction. How sacrosanct is the "deliverable" list in the >>> charter? I know that we are constrained from going beyond the charter, but >>> do we have to write documents that may not be of value just because they are >>> listed in the charter? >> >> The WG can recharter, but you will need to convince me (as the Area >> Director responsible for this WG) and the rest of IESG that the new >> work/charter is better than the old one. Rechartering is not hard, if there >> is enough WG support for it. > > > Does deciding that a proposed work item/deliverable is not really beneficial > require rechartering?
No. Adding things will likely require rechartering, but eliminating things doesn't. Of course, if we recharter for some other reason, we'd remove the unnecessary item as well. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
