On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with this. If there's stable documentation on DMARC usage > that we can cite, there's little value in adding our own, which is > likely to end up diverging from the others. > > Does anyone think we *should* proceed with writing this? > Hard to say. Maybe, with development of a DMARC on the standards track. But I'd like to see some momentum first in general, and secondly a good reason why this has to come from the IETF. Otherwise, some informative text in appendices in either ARC or DMARCbis should suffice, rather than a separate document. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
