On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 11:57:36AM -0700, Steven M Jones wrote: > Would there be a proposed schedule for that evaluation to take place? I > don't so much disagree with the description of how Experimental status > /should/ work, and including evaluation criteria would make sense. But > I'm not thrilled with the idea of ARC being left on the Experimental > track for umpteen years...
It's a good question, but I have two responses: 1. IETF timelines are worth approximately what one pays for them :) 2. The lack of criteria by which to evaluate the experiment was itself one of the reasons offered for not undertaking a move from experimental sooner. So not having the criteria will do nothing to prevent the dragging on. (Of course, not classifying as experimental _will_ prevent that dragging on, but comes with the downsides that Dave was suggesting.) A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
