> I don't think OpenARC development details are appropriate for the IETF list,
> are they?

For extended discussion, perhaps not, but it speaks to running code.
If discussion of implementations can lead to a better understanding of
the spec, or fixes to the spec, or whatever, tant mieux.

Barry

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to