On 07/18/2017 01:00 PM, Kurt Andersen wrote: > > We've suggested (during M3AAWG sessions) that smaller recipients can > build out a whitelist of "commonly seen" mediators, but might there be > value in having a mediator publish some sort of DNS record that would > indicate that they ARC seal mediated traffic?
That whitelist - if I'm not confused - is used by the small/medium receiver to identify ARC intermediaries whose ARC-sealed authentication information they can take as accurate. In other words, that they can _trust_ ARC information from those intermediaries... It's the stand-in for the sophisticated reputation systems that the large receivers already have. The problems with self-identifying oneself as trustworthy are pretty clear... I'm missing what the other use for this information would be. What's the result of plugging this information into the small/medium receiver's filters? --S. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
