On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sections 4.7 and 4.8 from my proposal (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/ > arch/msg/dmarc/yl1HWdNbmQR1wHlCvG3eRl9ph5E) were not moved into the > protocol elements section of the latest draft ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-10#section-4) > > This also opens the question of where Section 8 ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-10#section-8) > belongs. This section now feels more like a kitchen sink and implementation > guidance. > Both section changes noted in my edits-in-progress for -11. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
