On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote:
> > . . .for me "experimental" comes from the fact that there are several open > issues on which there has been lasting discussion within this group with no > resolution that data from an experiment will quickly shine light on. . . > I'm less sanguine about the likelihood of the deployment "quickly" generating data, especially since a bunch of what we are most interested in will be cloaked within the veil of proprietary processing within individual ADMDs. > I believe the argument in favor of Experimental is a weighty one, and I > think ARC fixes a meaty enough problem that getting to a published RFC is > of greater and more timely importance than getting to Proposed Standard. . . > Speed of getting an RFC number issued is, to me, the salient assertion. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
