While I wait for Bron's confirmation that my understanding matches his (see email from yesterday), on Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Seth Blank < [email protected]> wrote:
> > . . .text for . . . arc.closest-fail . . . > I'm uncomfortable with the terminology implied by the term "arc.closest-fail". I think that it is more "ams.closest-fail" or "arc.ams-broken". AMS is expected to not verify except in the most recent ARC set. Doing so is not in any way a "failure" and has no bearing on the validity of the ARC chain (as documented in the cv parameter). Opinions regarding a replacement term? --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
