On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 7:59 PM, <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, > Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF. > > Title : Message Header Field for Indicating Message > Authentication Status > Author : Murray S. Kucherawy > Filename : draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-00.txt > Pages : 48 > Date : 2018-02-07 > > Abstract: > This document specifies a message header field called Authentication- > Results for use with electronic mail messages to indicate the results > of message authentication efforts. Any receiver-side software, such > as mail filters or Mail User Agents (MUAs), can use this header field > to relay that information in a convenient and meaningful way to users > or to make sorting and filtering decisions. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-00 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-00 >
Et voila. If you go to the "History" tab and request a diff from the individual -00 to the working group -00, you can see all of the changes made relative to RFC7601. Basically it loosens up the language about what categories of things can be recorded, makes the ABNF changes requested, and guts some stuff copied from RFC7601 that doesn't need to be there for this version because it describes registry changes that were already made by that RFC. Let me know if I missed anything. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
