Thanks for capturing. I agree it makes sense to figure out ticket #16 ( https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/16#ticket) first.
Best, Peter On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Peter M. Goldstein < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Kurt, >> >> Re: -12, it doesn't appear to capture the feedback in the email Mark >> Eissler sent to the list on 2/27. There was also no on-list reply to his >> email that I saw, so I wanted to re-raise the issue. His email is included >> below. >> > > I've captured this point in https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/18. I > have no objections per se, but would like to know whether the group thinks > that the entire section should be removed into its own document (see > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/16#ticket). > > --Kurt > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
