On 21/03/18 15:18, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:00 PM, <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-13.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Kurt Andersen and posted to the >> IETF repository.
I see that Google are still listed as implementing Version 6 - and indeed, if you don't supply a t= tag in the AS (which is not required, as far as I can find in Version 13) then gmail.com says: "arc=fail (missing mandatory fields);" in it's A-R. Which should I implement? De-jure, or de-facto (and too-big-to-fail)? -- Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
