Something I noticed in a conversation on mailop. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:26:57 From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (5440)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7489, "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5440 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: John Levine <[email protected]> Section: 7.1 Original Text ------------- containing at least "v=DMARC1" similarly in three places in B.2.3: "v=DMARC1" Corrected Text -------------- containing at least "v=DMARC1;" similarly in three places in B.2.3: 'v=DMARC1;' Notes ----- The ABNF of dmarc-record in section 6.4 says that there has to be a semicolon after v=DMARC1, but several of the examples for the _report._dmarc record are missing the semicolon. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7489 (draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-12) -------------------------------------- Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Publication Date : March 2015 Author(s) : M. Kucherawy, Ed., E. Zwicky, Ed. Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : INDEPENDENT Area : N/A Stream : INDEPENDENT Verifying Party : ISE & Editorial Board _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
