On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Luis Muñoz <l...@uniregistry.link> wrote:
> There should be clear indication in the ARC-Seal about which of the > branches above were taken. > Agreed, and that was the intent of cv=invalid. However the working group had strong consensus not to go down that path. This could be another valuable output of the experiment, if the invalid case does require a separate chain validation status.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
