On Friday, July 27, 2018 10:20:04 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:03 AM, John R. Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah. I still think it should go, but if you really want to do that, invent > > a new enhanced status code. They're cheap. 5.7.7 isn't right, it's more > > like corrupt S/MIME bodies. > > I did a bunch of these (for DKIM and SPF at least) in RFC7372. You could > clone the template from there.
And if you don't want to make a new one, 5.7.26 (Multiple authentication checks failed) seems at least not wrong. To get to this point DKIM, DMARC, and ARC have failed. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
