> On Aug 3, 2018, at 7:03 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I feel like we're making a lot more edits here than the WG intended to make. > It's fine if the WG wants to turn this into a larger editorial pass, but I > thought the updates here were tightly scoped before, namely just enough to > allow ARC to do what it needs.
I supplied a list of editorial + bug fixes. IMO there's a fuzzy line between fixing errors, removing ambiguity, and de-torturing sentences for future readers. I'm also a fan of using tight scoping to keep focus, but need to point out that this WG has relaxed scope in the past to take on far more challenging work. Given that no document is ever taken on purely for editorial fixes, I'm OK with correcting the confusing bits while the door is open. -= Tim
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
