On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:03 PM Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1) I am not sure that deleted IANA registry descriptions (when compared > to RFC 7601) is the best way, considering that this document obsoletes > RFC 7601. I think it would be better to just keep the text and add a > sentence saying that it is unchanged from RFC 7601. But I am happy to > hear what IESG has to say about this. > Sorry, what's being deleted? RFC7601bis doesn't (shouldn't!) be deleting anything; it adds a couple of entries and makes itself authoritative for the registration of the header field, but otherwise nothing is changing. I thought that was pretty explicit. 2) The following took really long time to verify for correctness: > > [...] > > NEW: > > "value" is as defined in Section 5.1 of [MIME], with "quoted-string" > updated as specified in RFC 6532. > Fixed, though I won't post a new one until after LC (unless you think it would be useful). -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
