On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:11 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, November 05, 2018 10:01:03 AM Kurt Andersen wrote: > > I think that we could possibly already read this into the existing > charter, > > but the following one sentence patch makes it explicit: > > > > diff --git a/dmarc-wg-charter b/dmarc-wg-charter > > index a1d0fac..c8ac6bc 100644 > > --- a/dmarc-wg-charter > > +++ b/dmarc-wg-charter > > @@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ the working group can consider extending the base DMARC > > specification > > to accommodate such a standard, should it be developed during the > > life of this working group. > > > > +Clarifying the handling of internationalized email addresses (EAI) > > +throughout the authentication stack of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. > > + > > Improvements in DMARC features (identifier alignment, reporting, > > policy preferences) will be considered, such as: > > > > --Kurt > > I don't see anything about changes to SPF or DKIM being within the current > charter, so if we are going to do this, then I think it definitely needs a > charter change. > > What needs changing in SPF/DKIM that we need to take this on? > This came out of this morning's DISPATCH meeting at IETF103 ( https://tools.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/agenda) to be able to accept http://tools.ietf.org/html?draft=draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth into the WG for advancing it to an RFC (probably informational). --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
