> >> Both of these are indeed normative in usage, but I was under the > >> impression that one could not > >> refer to I-Ds as normative. > > > > One can't, so that means that this document will be held by the RFC > > Editor in a "MISSREF" (missing reference) state until both of the I-D > > are also in the RFC Editor queue. Then this document will move ahead. > > True, but being "afraid of a MISSREF" is not a good enough reason to pretend > that a Normative > reference is Informative.
Of course not, and I didn't mean to imply that it was. I was explaining that we *can* send the document forward with a missing normative reference. "We" do not have to wait for it to clear; the RFC Editor will. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
