On December 10, 2018 4:31:03 PM UTC, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> >> Since I'm most familiar with RFC 7208, I took a more detailed look at >the >> SPF updates. Much of the current text is a restatement of what RFC >7208 >> says. I don't know that we need that. The difference is to make >explicit >> what was already implicit; s and l macros will never match if the >local >> part of the email address contains non-ascii characters. >> > >Why not? If the non-ASCII (or non-7bit) characters are puny-coded, it >seems >like they should be able to match without any problems. > AIUI, local parts don't get puny-coded. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
- [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levine-appsare... Kurt Andersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levin... Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levin... Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levin... Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levin... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-l... Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-l... Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of dra... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of... Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adopti... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adopti... John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of dra... John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levin... Jiankang Yao
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recommend adoption of draft-levin... Peter M. Goldstein
