On Sun 06/Jan/2019 06:45:57 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Here's what I've come up with. This is a diff between RFC7601 as published > and > what I propose as RFC7601bis to resolve all of the DISCUSSes and most of the > COMMENTs from IESG review. Please let me know if I've missed anything. I'll > post it at the end of the coming week if there are no issues raised. > > http://www.blackops.org/~msk/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-rfc7601bis-from-rfc7601.diff.html
I see sender-id still has full citizenship. Now I'm not clear which will be first, but my feeling is that rfc7601bis and status-change-change-sender-id-to-historic are going to be published more or less at the same time. When a method is moved to historic, are the corresponding parameters in the IANA registry moved to deprecated? If yes, should the move be stated by which document? Thank you Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
