On January 22, 2019 6:53:33 PM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>With the posting of -05, we expect the last DISCUSSes to clear (one
>already
>has) and the document can proceed.
>
>During DISCUSS discussions, it was pointed out that the ADSP, Sender
>ID,
>and DomainKeys specifications bear "Historic" status, and thus they
>should
>not be carried forward into the new version; they will continue to
>exist in
>the Authentication-Results registries, but their status will be changed
>to
>"deprecated" and their defining documents will be left at RFC7601,
>while
>the others that are still current will remain "active" and their
>defining
>documents will be updated to point to this new one.
>
>As this wasn't expressly part of the Working Group Last Call, it's
>appropriate that this be posted here and people be given a chance to
>express their opinions on this last-minute change. Thus, with the
>Chairs'
>approval, I'll post this on Friday absent any sustained objection, and
>Alexey can then send it off to the editors.
>
>The proposed diff to -05 can be seen here:
>http://www.blackops.org/~msk/diff.html
>
>-MSK
According to the rules of the registry (as described in RFC 7601), a designated
expert can change entries to deprecated without a specification.
No need to tie this to 7601bis. Just ask IANA to make the changes (since
you're the primary designated expert).
If you do that, then dropping them from 7601bis is obviously correct. I think
it's correct anyway, but that's cleaner.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
