Thanks for the review, Tim. The html rendering issues are for the RFC editor to deal with, and not in the scope of the draft editors.
Barry On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tim Evens via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > Reviewer: Tim Evens > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-?? > Reviewer: Tim Evens > Review Date: 2019-03-11 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-14 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > Ready with nits. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Throughout the draft, section references (html rendering) does not > correctly > HREF the RFC and section. For example, page-5 Section 6 has a reference to > section 6.6.1 of RFC7489, but the HTML rendering HREF links to this draft > instead of correctly linking to RFC7489 Section 6.6.1. Ideally the > references > should link correctly, for example on page-3 Section 4 with "Section 3 of > [RFC7208]." > > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
