Hi. Just posted this...
(I'm separately sending this to the dbound list, but figure
cross-posting isn't productive.)
Comments eagerly sought, of course.
d/
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:23:14 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: T. Adams <[email protected]>, D. Crocker <[email protected]>,
Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
A new version of I-D, draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by D. Crocker and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter
Revision: 00
Title: DNS Perimeter Overlay
Document date: 2019-04-02
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 20
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter/
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter
Abstract:
The Domain Name System (DNS) naming syntax provides no meta-data for
indicating administrative transitions through the hierarchy. For
example, it does not distinguish the higher-level portions that
operate as public registries, versus those that operate as private
organizations. This specification creates a basic overlay mechanism
for defining a logical Perimeter between administrative entities
through the naming hierarchy. The mechanism can then be applied for
a variety of independent administrative indications.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
