On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:55 PM Douglas E. Foster < [email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know how to express my shock at today's conversations. One of > the shocks comes from this: > > We have consensus that the better email filters do not need the DMARC for > PSDs standard, because they are already blocking non-existent domains. > This neglects the benefit to the domain operators of receiving the reports about abuse of their domain space. For the end recipient of the bogus traffic, there is no difference. > The inferior email filters are not expected to implement this feature, > because they are inferior products. > Somewhat tautological, but most likely true. > Therefore the new standard has no expected benefit, but we need to finish > it anyway. > Incorrect - see my first point. --Kurt >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
