On Friday, April 19, 2019 09:11:45 AM Kurt Andersen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 8:44 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > I took a look at the non-comment content of the public portion of the PSL > > to > > get an idea of the scope of this problem. Here's the distribution of > > lengths > > of public suffixes: > > > > one: 3077 > > two: 3821 > > three: 1986 > > four: 3 > > > > None longer than that, unless I screwed up my script. > > While it may have changed since the days of DBOUND, I recall that there was > at least one hierarchy which had a public --> private --> public --> > private double transition which could make for longer names.
OK. I don't think that changes the analysis as long as all the public components are listed. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
