One more point on this: On 5/24/19 7:37 AM, John R Levine wrote: > > That's because they separated before they were published, so there was > nothing to be incompatible with. If I knew what would break when > reorganizing and rewriting a document into pieces, I could fix it, but > since I don't, and nobody else does, let's not go there.
You seem to be suggesting that the standards-track DMARCbis should be different because an informational, non-WG RFC has already been published. From a process standpoint that's bad; standards-track RFCs should go through exactly the same process regardless of whether or not they were previously published as Informational. -Jim _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
