I'll initiate WGLC before the weekend.  I have some feedback from outside
the WG that I will forward, but it's not serious enough to block starting
WGLC.

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:17 AM Craig Schwartz <craig=
[email protected]> wrote:

> I've reviewed the draft.  We plan to implement this as soon as possible
> (for .bank and
> .insurance) and would like to see this get to WG last call shortly.
>
> Craig Schwartz
> Managing Director
> fTLD Registry Services | .BANK & .INSURANCE
> Office: +1 202 589 2532
> Mobile: +1 202 236 1154
> Skype: craig-schwartz
> www.fTLD.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 6:53 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
>> Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication,
>> Reporting, and Conformance) Extension For PSDs (Public Suffix Domains)
>>         Author          : Scott Kitterman
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04.txt
>>         Pages           : 11
>>         Date            : 2019-05-27
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
>>    Conformance) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating
>>    organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for
>>    message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving
>>    organization can use to improve mail handling.  DMARC policies can be
>>    applied at the individual domain level or for a set of domains at the
>>    organizational level.  The design of DMARC precludes grouping
>>    policies for a set of domains above the organizational level, such as
>>    TLDs (Top Level Domains).  These types of domains (which are not all
>>    at the top level of the DNS tree) can be collectively referred to as
>>    Public Suffix Domains (PSDs).  For the subset of PSDs that require
>>    DMARC usage, this memo describes an extension to DMARC to enable
>>    DMARC functionality for such domains.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-04
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to