> On May 27, 2019, at 3:32 PM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > Section 6.3 says that ruf and rua tags can take any URI, but only > define the meaning of a mailto: URI. Either it should define some > other URI schemes or it should say that only mailto: URIs are valid. > > Back in the olden days there was an http or https scheme that we took > out because it was ill specified, and nobody but me had tried to > implement it. If people are interested in an https PUT scheme it > would be easy enough to define one, but only if someone says they want > to use it. For large reports it could be somewhat faster than mailto > both because the report body isn't base64 encoded and the report goes > straight to the https server and doesn't get relayed as mail does.
FWIW I've added this to the tracker: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/29#ticket ...and have mentioned the http POST scheme for TLSRPT. Feel free to add more context if you'd like. =- Tim _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
