On Saturday, July 13, 2019 12:34:09 AM EDT John Levine wrote: > In article <2902055.CzhLQO0xIX@l5580> you write: > >Here's the definition we have in the draft now: > >> 2.6. Non-existent Domains > >> > >> For DMARC [RFC7489] purposes, a non-existent domain is a domain name > >> that publishes none of A, AAAA, or MX records that the receiver is > >> willing to accept. This is a broader definition than that in > >> NXDOMAIN [RFC8020]. > > > >That's what I was expecting this new tag to apply to (and I think matches > >their expectation, but they can speak for themselves). > > That's OK. > > >Another way to say what's in 2.6 now might be: > > > >... a domain for which there is a NODATA response for A, AAAA, and MX > >records. > Not so OK -- if there's no records at all at or below a name you really will > get NXDOMAIN.
Good point. Thanks. I'll leave it as is. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
