One (hopefully) last thing: On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:23 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 3.4. Section 6.6.3. Policy Discovery > > A new step between step 3 and 4 is added: > > 3A. If the set is now empty and the longest PSD (Section 2.3) of the > Organizational Domain is one that the receiver has determined is > acceptable for PSD DMARC, the Mail Receiver MUST query the DNS for > a DMARC TXT record at the DNS domain matching the longest PSD > (Section 2.3) in place of the RFC5322.From domain in the message > (if different). A possibly empty set of records is returned. > > Section 6.6.3 of DMARC doesn't talk about "acceptable for DMARC", so I don't > know what "acceptable for PSD DMARC" might mean. > > Section numbers in the prose of this section should make clear which document > they're referencing. > > I think an example in an appendix that shows an evaluation without PSD and then with PSD, and then some prose about what it enables (i.e., what the benefit is), would be extremely helpful. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
