Hello Steve, in both cases it is about information that was sent over from the same mailhost. To whom the information was sent decides the operator of the mailhost, not the one who suppresses failure reports.
In any case, for a failure report containing only the Message-Id it does not matter what information the email carried and to whom the information was sent. Regards Дилян On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 09:07 +0100, Steve Atkins wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2019, at 10:41 PM, Дилян Палаузов <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I just thougth once again on this. > > > > Some of the senders of aggregate reports offer free mailboxes. > > > > Aggregate reports show that emails from a host to a provider of free > > mailboxes sometimes do not validate DMARC. > > > > The one provider sending emails opens a free mailbox on the receiver and > > then sends a secret copy of each, otherwise > > ordinary delivered email, to that special mailbox. > > > > Then the mails from that mailbox are downloaded, and the A-R header is > > checked. By this way the sender finds out, which > > messages exactly have failed DMARC validation. > > > > At the end the same information is obtained, that can be obtained by > > exchanging a failure report: which messages have > > failed. > > Information found in mail mail headers in accounts that you have created > includes email that's been sent to you. > > Information found in failure reports includes email that generally was not > sent to you. > > Cheers, > Steve > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
