On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM John C Klensin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > --On Monday, December 2, 2019 08:29 -0800 Dave Crocker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 12/2/2019 7:56 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > >> There's also already RFC7960 which expands upon 5598 with > >> specific reference to DMARC's impact. > > > > ahh. thanks. > > > > It will help to have folk comment on the IETF mailing list, so > > that Klensin's comments don't just get responses from me. > > Unfortunately, 7960 does not explicitly update 5598, so that > relationship is difficult for anyone not heavily involved to > discover (that neither Dave nor I was aware of the relationship > is probably symptomatic). This may eventually call for an > update that replaces both documents or may further justify a > more or less comprehensive Applicability Statement for the core > email protocols. In this regard I think that something like Hector's "practitioner's guide" (probably as a BCP rather than a protocol standard) would be immensely helpful and meet this need. Maybe we need to look for making a trilogy of docs rather than just a duet: *21, *22, *23 :-) --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
