On Monday, December 9, 2019 7:41:27 PM EST Brandon Long wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:44 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 12/7/2019 12:11 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > >> Remind me again the the additional work is that might be too much?
> > >> Isn't it just another DNS lookup for the org domain -1... of which
> > >> there are maybe a couple thousand and easily cacheable?
> > >> 
> > >> This seems way less than say the additional work for ARC.
> > > 
> > > It's slightly more.  There's also a check to see if a LPSD (org -1)
> > > is a PSD > DMARC participant.  Exactly how to document that is the major
> > > unresolved question that we should evaluate experimentally.  It might
> > > be one of three
> > 
> > > things:
> > First, this sort of exchange highlights the need for considering basic
> > operational issues carefully and before publication.
> > 
> > Second, it highlights the challenges of doing that in a way that isn't
> > myopic.  What is easy/cheap for highly motivated, expert, well-resourced
> > participants might not be all that easy or cheap for the larger Internet
> > community.  (This is the operational side of scalability.)
> 
> Ah, re-reading the spec, I'd guess we're talking about the scalability of
> psddmarc.org.

It's only relevant for the purposes of the experiment.  Part of coming to 
consensus on the longer term plan would be making sure we have a scalable 
approach for determining PSD DMARC participants.

> [snip]
> 
> > Also, any suggestion to rely on a published list ignores the history of
> > problems with such lists, as well as at least requiring a careful
> > specification for the list and a basis for believing it will be
> > maintained well.
> 
> I mean, the PSL is already a maintained object.  Is this new detail
> something
> that has different ownership/privacy/etc concerns than the existing details?
> 
> I'm sure I probably missed this, but couldn't we avoid this question by
> just mandating
> no reporting for non-existing organizational domains?  Is that a
> non-starter?

It's one of the use cases we are trying to cover.  I don't know if that makes 
it a non-starter.

Scott K



_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to