On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 12:39:09 PM EST Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > I support publishing the I-D as confirmed in the WGLC with (perhaps) some > additional caveats regarding the ephemerality of the Experiment as deemed > necessary by the chairs. > > Given the expected duration of the experiment (at least a year to collect > some useful data, if not 2-3 years), I also support unblocking the other > work in this WG since we ought not wait for this experiment to "conclude" > (whatever that means) before proceeding on other work items.
I don't see any reason the other WG items can't proceed in parallel with the experiment. I believe the changes to DMARC to bring it to IETF standards, particularly the need for an alternative to the PSL, will take significant effort to achieve. As a result, I think there's little risk that results from the experiment will end up being a critical path item for any WG effort. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
