The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8601,
"Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6026

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: John Levine <[email protected]>

Section: 2.2

Original Text
-------------
     resinfo = [CFWS] ";" methodspec [ CFWS reasonspec ]
               [ CFWS 1*propspec ]



Corrected Text
--------------
     resinfo = [CFWS] ";" methodspec [ CFWS reasonspec ]
               *( CFWS propspec )



Notes
-----
When there is more than one propspec, they are separated by spaces. Every 
implementation I know puts in the spaces. This was correct in RFC 7601, but see 
unconfirmed erratum 5435 which introduced the mistake.

While we're at it, take out the [CFWS] at the end of the definition of pvalue 
which is redundant and confusing.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8601 (draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Message Header Field for Indicating Message 
Authentication Status
Publication Date    : May 2019
Author(s)           : M. Kucherawy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & 
Conformance
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to