> The intention in 8601 is pretty clear, even though the ABNF doesn't agree:
Yes, the RFC says the authserv-id can contain UTF-8, but its author stated that he intended it to be "either a plain old ASCII domain name or an A-label". One does not need UTF-8 for that. If authserv-id were not > authserv-id = value but > authserv-id = token ; token from RFC2045 wouldn't the author's intent have been covered as well, without any reference to RFC6531/6532? Damian _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
