On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 3:48 PM Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/07/2020 23:39, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > Any opinion on the whole thing generally? > > Certainly worthy of discussion. I wonder if it needs tying > to ARC rather than, or in addition to DKIM? > I think it solves the same problem ARC does. You want to know what authentication was possible at the time the MLM received the message; ARC transmits that information downstream using cryptographic signatures, while this lets the verifier see for itself. I originally floated this idea years before ARC was proposed, but there was no apparent community interest in pursuing it so I let it expire. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
