On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:18 AM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > In article <[email protected]> you write: > > > >It occurs to me that discussion about how this latest proposal might or > >might not have similarities to ARC should encourage everyone making a > >proposal to add commentary that gives a full sense of end-to-end use. > > Agreed. Hence my point that this is much harder to integrate into > mailing lists, and the useful signal you get, that you started with a > valid message from some X, is the same. >
There's a distinction though. ARC tells you "that guy over there said the original message passed", and you have to trust it. On the other hand, the transformations draft, when it works, hands you the original message, and you don't have to make that trust assessment. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
