On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:53 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am not a fan of splitting documents only for an abstract sense of > cleanliness. There needs to be justification of improved documentation > 'cleanliness' and/or useful removal of fate-sharing -- if separate fates > are reasonably expected. > > > DMARC alignment validation is a basic, mechanical process that produces > a yes/no response. At that level, it's comparable to the nature of a > DKIM validation, except for the From: field domain. > > DMARC "policy" is fundamentally different. It's not that its mechanism > isn't "mechanical" but that its semantics produce more semantic and > operational challenges. > > > I think that could reasonably make it worth strongly separating them > into two different documents, no matter has small one of the documents > might be. > I think it was you that suggested having the determination of the Organizational Domain be its own distinct process. Would that fit into the first document, or should that also be something external? -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
