On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Dotzero wrote:
If the people you claim don't want the outcome they have as a result of the
DMARC policy that they published then maybe they should publish a different
policy. Have you considered contracting them, any of them, to tell them you
know their wishes better than they do?
Ericsson publishes p=reject over the objections of their employees, some
fairly high in the hierarchy, who they subsidize to participate in the
IETF and its mailing lists. I've coached some of them on what to say,
didn't help.
Of course you personally know what DMARC policies mean and what they
imply. But every time a list has to rewrite a From line, we have evidence
that someone else doesn't or at best doesn't care.*
R's,
John
* - I have on excellent authority that when Yahoo published p=reject to
outsource the costs of their security breaches, Marissa Meyer said she
knew it would break everyone's mailing lists and she didn't care.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
