Exactly. I was speculating. What reasons could possibly exist for a domain to be given another method for not saying anythng? You make my point - there are no valid reasons to do so.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone<div> </div><div> </div><!-- originalMessage --><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Dotzero <[email protected]> </div><div>Date: 11/7/20 1:34 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: IETF DMARC WG <[email protected]> </div><div>Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Optional p= makes no sense </div><div> </div><SNIP>..
> > p=none probably means "I am trying to get my administrative controls in > place, but I am not there yet", which still supports my earlier comment > that "I don't know how to advise you on whether to accept or reject this > message". > p=none simply means "This domain is not asserting policy". Reading anything more than that into it is pure speculation. Michael Hammer _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
