In article <5bc82960-70a4-3ce2-4e3d-a39dd9743...@wisc.edu> you write: >If tree walking is a thing that comes to fruition, what does it mean for a >domain to be an organizational >domain (in reference to the idea that the DMARC spec will just point to >another doc to determine the org >domain)? Aren't all parent domains org domains of their children? Or is >there something special about >the "top" org domain that I'm not understanding?
If we switch to a tree walk I would expect that rather than a formal org domain we'd call it parent default or something like that, meaning the next name up the tree that has a DMARC record. The semantics are definitely not the same. You now can put a DMARC record on a name below the org domain to shadow a subtree, but I don't think that is a problem that needs to be solved. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
