On Wed 02/Dec/2020 20:46:54 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote:
While this ticket/enhancement specifically mentions ARC, I could perhaps see the usefulness in other places. It seems like it would be more beneficial to create a method by which other documents could provide XML- based "extensions" to the report. This would allow mechanisms relying on DMARC to independently define their reporting schema to be included in DMARC aggregate reports. Alternately, we could focus specifically on ARC, and work to include that in the base XML. This means that any later reporting requirements could again require changes to the core drafts.
Another possibility is for ARC to define its own report format. Hijacking rua= targets to send a different kind of report should be allowed. Otherwise, we could define a new tag, e.g. rue= (e for Extension).
In either case, as we're introduce variations in aggregate report content, we have to devise a method for determining what version/kind of report is attached to a given message.
Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
